Many probably heard the name "Hannibal" at least once in their life. Perhaps someone even watched the “silence of the lamb” and remembers Mr. Hopkins (he looks at you right now, yes), who, with his long speeches with a blue look at other worlds (or his own palace?) won the honor and respect of all lovers of high -quality cinema.
However, some time ago the notorious Brian Fuller (if you don’t know who, I advise you to see something from his works as a acquaintance-yes, so simple) offered the world now for two seasons of his series about this wonderful fictional person who is so elegant that everything becomes much better, brighter and more interesting in the room around him.
The problem is that at the same time he is a serial pervert killer who has no friends, loved ones, and the psyche was distorted in early childhood.
But who cares.
And, depending on the series, about which a more expanded opinion will be lower, I decided to get acquainted with the original source, that is, with the books of Thomas Harris, and to understand why I heard about Hannibal quite often, for which he is loved, what is his meaning and, of course, to spend the deepest (and at the same time the fastest, because all thoughts were converted for a long time) analytics (necessarily on the sofa behind a glacial.drinking juice and jamming with sausages) about the fact that/who is better: books/films/series, Hopkins/Mikkelson, Norton/Dance, or this is generally a phenomenon (and this is precisely the phenomenon, there is no dispute) does not deserve anyone’s attention and everything is in vain in vain.
No, it, of course, is clear that everything is in vain, but let’s imagine that there is no.
Books of Thomas Harris
"Red Dragon"
The logic of human perception to disgrace is changeable. ©
If you get out of the free hour or two and you suddenly decide to spend it after some gorgeous book and remember about Hannibal Lecter, then … forget it.
Thomas Harris is a unique writer. More precisely, if we consider the concept of “writer” as a kind of aplomb of skill, talent and ultimate successful activity, then Harris is not a writer.
Perhaps it is best described by a line in the Russian Wikipedia: » Information about him is extremely scarce and contradictory »
Thomas Harris is a boring writer.
A meager writer.
With all due respect to those bright moments that are in his books, if you have a choice between Harris and someone else, in whom you are more sure-do not read Harris, at least from the first book.
However, with all this, I can say that it is worth reading Harris.
Because the world that he created, and the characters he invented is stronger than his mean language.
They got out of the pages and began to live separately from words in the book. The latter only show us those small actions that they do.
Choose.
He has five books. About the very first one, which, apparently, does not apply to Hannibal, Wikipedia is silent (and everyone knows the law that if Vika does not know, no one knows), the remaining four are connected with Dr. Lecturer.
Rarely, but aptly – this is about Thomas.
And the point is not what this author writes. The fact is how.
Quite frequent attempts to reveal the inner world of the heroes do not cause suggestion, because so scarce and hollywood is pathetic in themselves, and mix with an abundance of simple listing of what is happening at one time or another of the narrative in the book, which is especially evident in the Red Dragon, which, if I had not for living images from the series in my head, would absolutely throw it in the middle. There is a feeling that Harris, working as a complete shift at the machine, coming home tired, simply sat down at the letter and spilled a hail of events and people on paper, practically forgetting (or maybe there was no strength) about the thoughts of the latter and that the uninitiated reader can drown in this dryness and the same images.
However, we must pay tribute. The worst book-“Red Dragon”-still has positive spots called Francis Dolarhaide, the main villain-wablet and the whole in the book that a certain Nedofbrovets (and, so it turned out, unmartly) Will Graham, along the way consulting with Dr. Hannibal Lecter, who was sitting in prison for killing people and even killing people and even killed people and even killed people and even killed people and even killed peopleTupred with them.
Francis Dolarhaide is spelled out. It is prescribed by this “event” language, but events allow – with proper desire and ability – to penetrate the world of this person and, in fact, understand why he is so … strange and abnormal. This is interesting.
Hannibal himself in the “Red Dragon” is extremely small, and not to say that he somehow shows himself particularly much as a character, as a personality. I don’t know if Harris thought about continuing his story when he wrote this book, but, of course, a huge backlog was made, which Harris realized in the next books.
"Red Dragon" – prelude.
For the most part, the inept, only in places with the main villain extremely and extremely successful, but protracted to indecent and greedy in everything except described by the official boring language of events.
"Silence of lambs"
Claris, look at things easier, and will be fun. ©
Starting with "silence of lambs", things are going better. Harris removed a third of the volume of the “red dragon”, and psychologically output a series of events described by the simple language of the worker after the shift (may the author forgive me-nothing personal, seriously) becomes much easier), especially since the normal main character appears-Claris Starling, now a full-fledged FBI officer, who, like her colleague from the last book, must find the murderer-murderer, consulting a murderer, consulting withHannibal, who still sits in prison for his delicious sins.
Claris-again, unlike Will Graham-describes much better, although in vain attempts to get into her head from Harris are still perceived as something that should not be in the book, because these extra words prevent events from developing and getting information from themselves.
Agent Starling is extremely passionate about the work that he got about the uncle, who abducts the girls and pulls the skin from them (it is impossible to stay alive).
Hannibal, as usual, knows more than he speaks, and if he says, then fun for the sake of, and, most likely, he cannot believe him, because the sophisticated (and perverted) mind comes up with such combinations and connections that are obviously impossible to solve. However, it somehow turns out that Hannibal is imbued with some … sympathy for Claris. She intrigues him, although, of course, not so much as not to sleep at night in her pretty cell, but nevertheless.
And in the end, it turns out that Hannibal plays with everyone, everything is on his games, and in the end the smart doctor dulls gracefully everyone and is at large, at which new feats await him … and new games.
As for the form itself, in which the story is dressed (in the book it is not so short, of course, but we have a concise retelling of everything that my head invented), then progress is visible here. Moreover: “Silence of lambs” is the beginning of Harris’s progress as a writer, and he progresses in every book. Not so much as to distinguish it among other authors in style, but enough to read and not yawn from boredom with the proper power of desire. The main part of the plot turns is still not too ornate (and the genre of the work, by the way, is “detective”, so draw conclusions), but considering the details, looking at the characters’ actions, I want to penetrate more and more-and Harris gives us access to the interpretation of the actions of Hannibal and Claris Starling, showing, in fact, these actions are these actions.
Unlike Will Graham, who, as the main good character, was unusually weak and uninteresting, Claris is already perceived as something more real, and not existing only on the pages. She clearly traces the character and ideology, through her conversations with Hannibal (which, of course, contrary to the prohibitions are not limited only to business details), we learn about her fears, childhood, motivation for entering the FBI, etc. Hannibal himself was given more "page" time, and he uses it properly, without wasting on nothing on nothing – that is why it becomes interesting. Finally, it shows what makes him-Hannibal, whom people of more than one generation fell in love with the essence that he is. That essence of deadly grace, total emotional peace of mind even in the most difficult situations and the incompetent power of charisma.
However, the surprise crept unnoticed. Having invested all his strength in Claris and Hannibal, Harris forgot that he also introduced the main villain who would entertain this honest couple the whole book.
Chapters.The bastard is not surprisingly spelled out, half a page is written about its motivation, and it is not shown so often as to at least somehow feel it, understand, consider, evaluate it. He was completely lubricated against the background, and even without the background he looked like a pale shadow of his predecessor Dolarheide from the Red Dragon, which undoubtedly sadden me, because how much Francis was so chic – so no time Jame Gamba, the main bad guy of "silence".
Nevertheless, I can say that, unlike the poor “Red Dragon”, where only Francis Dolarhaide was of interesting, “Silence of the lamb” already indulges in the reader with a large spectrum of interesting events and sometimes even (sometimes (!) thoughts, even if the whole philosophy of thought and not too deep to delve into it for more than three minutes.
However, this is already something.
The disclosure of the characters, the first (and very successful) manifestations of non-stop of the grace of Hannibal, with which he simply breaks the environment, and several successful plot turns made the book readable.
And given its small sizes, then you can even safely recommend reading, if you have no turbulence about the fact that you are reading a cycle of books, starting from the second.
An abnormal reaction to a non -standard situation is normal. ©
Hunting and a bottle of Red Stag, Thomas you Harris!
Without putting off in a long box: Hannibala read in one breath, for there is here, I list:
-many, many Hannibal;
-many, many Claris Starling;
– a bouquet of new interesting characters, 70% of which are repelled throughout the head;
-for lovers of Assassin’s Creed II or just fans of history: Italy, Florence, Patsci (from the kind of those same Patszi, yes);
– Paphos Over 9k;
– stunning scenes closer to the end;
– Gorgeous … delicious ending.
"Hannibal" is the strongest work of Harris. The largest in volume. Reading him, I got the impression that Harris had finally relaxed. He no longer needs to go to the factory to the machine – he wakes up in the morning, eats deliciously and writes for pleasure. As I learned two (well, three) previous books. He no longer loads us incomprehensibly why the necessary information. There is no more incomprehensible why the necessary characters. Here everyone plays a role here, here everyone is remembered, the main characters (this is not only Starling and Hannibal) are spelled out (even if, again, from the point of view of eventfulness, but the eventful event, juicy, in the case), and those next attempts of Harris to look into the head of the main characters, even if they have not evolved from the time of the “red dragon”, but at least they are blocked by the rest of the content.
The book has found the structure that you see by reading it. If earlier a bunch of unnecessaries was mixed and did not allow adequately evaluate the very nucleus of the work, then wherever you look – you will look at the essence of the book.
There is no main villain in Hannibal.
And this is, in my opinion, the phenomenon of this character, which was discharged from books to the film and the series (which, in fact, supported this idea).
Hannibal himself is not a villain, although, of course, what he does with some people, by the standards of earthly not too correctly. We cannot hate him for all the atrocities. We cannot love him because he does not give.
The last book will only strengthen this thought with examples from the early life of Hannibal.
Hannibal and not a hero, because the list of good deeds is blocked by a list of seriousness of the unkind.
Hannibal stuck outside these concepts. Not a hero or a villain. Killer – yes, but not everyone and everyone. Elegant and beautiful, sophisticated and holding his back, knowing himself and others and living with this load.
Here you can recall the dester from the series of the same name-the guys did something similar to Hannibal, except that they turned their eyes on other sides of the person.
And it is from this book, as it is Such easy to guess, that we can say that history has become about Hannibal. This became obvious for Harris himself, who, in fact, in the "silence of the lamb" fired Lecter from the post of consultant of the FBI and put him to freedom so that he was engaged in his affairs.
For the first time, the relationship of people is fully disclosed. If earlier, in the two previous ones, they smelled of an official component and a business component (as an exception, one can recall Francis Dolarhaide, who was boring for this post, but because of his personality characteristics, his relationship with one character turned out to be not very successful and complete), it seemed that it was like normal relations between people, each of which has its own character, their own thoughts (even if Harris still expresses them in writingin one language that he can – well, it happened).
Perhaps the whole book is finally a relationship, and not just events. People talk to each other, share their own, listen to each other. And on personal relationships everything is tied. And because of personal relations, all events are taking place.
The whole book is a bright fountain of events and relationships, which eventually pour into an insanely colorful finale, which is assumed by the meanings and closed gestalts from everyone who took part in it.
I can even say that this is a worthy option for those who have other books on “reading”, because this work will compete not to any collection of pages, but many, many.
"Hannibal: Climbing"
Everyone loves a repentant sinner. Prodigal son who has embarked on the path of correction. He was mistaken before, but now it will not be. ©
Having finished the Hannibal with a wide gesture, before Harris, there probably was a feeling that the continuation of the story about Hannibal would be extremely inappropriate (and it will be so, of course), but it should not be finished with this hero (and I perfectly understand why). It is difficult to invent a new one, especially Harris, who, although he distinguished himself between the sear of chic images in Hannibal, but still where the guarantees that this is not an accident, but the beginning of the pattern?
And Thomas rightly decided that it was necessary to answer some questions that hung in the air since the time, perhaps, “silence of the lamb” and, remembering his Francis Dolarheid, wrote the backstory of Hannibal.
Whether it turned out?
Yes, it turned out.
The impression of the book: Briefly, predictable, but very beautiful.
It is very strange, especially recalling the beginning of my speeches, to say that Harris can write something beautifully, but it is.
The plot of the book does not stand out with anything, but given that the main reason why Hannibal became what he became, we knew for a long time from previous books, then no intrigue arose. Moreover: as soon as the moment X passed, it was completely clear what the young 18 -year -old Lecter would do the rest of the book and how it all ends (of course, it ended as it was predicted).
And in this light it doesn’t look bad. Of course, it was possible better, and in this plot plan “ascent” is a step back compared to “Hannibal”, however … We have a book dedicated only to Hannibal. No Claris, no eager revenge, only Hannibal, his problem and those connections that connect Hannibal with … his own inner world. And isn’t that wonderful?
Harris finally learned to create beautiful paintings. Rushing everything that was in “climbing”, there are three such paintings: wartime, the prone France and the Japanese style, which is shrouded in the whole image of Hannibal.
Hannibal Paphsen, more than ever. Young teenage pathos, which, unlike what we had, was a pathos on the case, because it was supported by actions.
Hannibala was taught sophistication – and he demonstrated it always and everywhere. It can be said that this Japanese sophistication, the Japanese style, the Japanese soul leaked to Hannibal and became Hannibal – both early and late, even if at the moments of the events of the previous three books, a certain European note still touched the slope that he left behind.
And why is the calm plot part (which, however, is not calm in events, but, again, predictable) is suitable for this book? Because the lack of impressions of the plot allows you to concentrate on the style of Hannibal, allows you to finally examine it from all sides and understand what moves them and why everything is as it is.
And when it comes to the active phase and Hannibal finally begins to cut everyone at different angles, this manifests itself best: the enchanting paintings of ugly violence, which Hannibal turns into works of art, personally leave me indifferent, forcing me to look and look at the image of this still a guy who, with a stable pulse of 72 shots per minute, copes with what is presented to himThe state of degradants and those who are trying to humanize themselves again – or pretending to be again.
"Climbing" is a calm book. Beautiful. Perceived as an afterword, which, despite the status of the background, is.
I recommend? Only after reading the entire cycle – then the impression will be correct. In isolation from it is not, not worth.
What do we have in the end?
It is not the best cycle of books that begins for a sad rest, but ends … also for the rest, but more interesting and only for those who are “in the subject”, and only in the middle there is an explosion of everything that the author was capable of.
And such boredom, in which Harris drove one and a half books and which is now ineptly trying to present the last work on the dish, is drawn by none other than Hannibal. There were Dolarhaide, Claris Starling, there were Mason Verger, his surroundings, his thugs, the same paci from the kind of those same, khe, Pazzi, the few, but disgusting (in terms of their personal qualities, and not presenting them to the reader), the fbrovites and someone probably still stood on them, and not that was not that there wasn’t that it was not that it was not that it was not that it was not that it was not that there wasn’t that, there wasn’t it, there wasn’t it, there wasn’t just that they were standing …And he enjoyed, sometimes leading a hand over their heads, so that these stupid people would do what would be interesting to Dr. Lecturer.
Hannibal Lecter – a unique phenomenon in this literature. It was spelled out surprisingly well (Harris mastered for four books, we must pay tribute, and it turned out interesting), a stylish and unperturbed, manipulator and a victim, no matter how his life is put, and atypically beautiful even in his most terrible atrocities, which he exhibits as works of art.
A person with powerful intelligence and self -control, for whom self -development in all aspects is one of the main words that develops into action.
The character is chic, and I understand those people who were imbued with his stories and even wanted to make a film, and later – the series.
And how it happened – we will quickly consider further.
Our brain is designed for short pulses of anxiety, and not for prolonged violence that you seem to like. Therefore, it seems to you that the lion will swallow you now … ©
Once upon a time, back in the middle of the decade, I already touched Hannibal Lecter. And I knew that, watching the film "Silence of the lamb", I look at that very Hannibal Lecter.
But to admit honestly: my tastes and my evaluative abilities at that time were not enough to understand the whole charm of the film.
Moreover: I did not have all this to understand why everyone dies from the wonderful image of Anthony Hopkins. I then noted his blue eyes, but that’s all I remember in the film.
Nice to discover something new for yourself after so many years.
So, here the text will be exactly smaller than higher, because I will not paint each film too much, but I will highlight the common features characteristic of all four films. Oddly enough, it is for everyone, and this is striking.
Anthony Hopkins.
His merit in the role of the success of the “red dragon”, “silence of the lamb” and “Hannibal” is certainly undeniable, and moreover: if he hadn’t, the last two films of the listed would definitely be more than times worse than with him.
And the fact is that Anthony simply did what was required of him: he played his role, and he played Hannibal Lecter.
It happened surprisingly: Hopkins One hundred percent accurately (and I emphasize without exaggeration: absolutely accurately accurately) transferred the book image of Hannibal, which, as we recall, is sufficiently registered, so as not to think of something for the author, on the screen.
Moreover, he suffered him so convincing that, it seems, only then Harris himself wrote off a little something from Hopkins. In the book “Hannibal” (1999), it was written at the end that Lecter, carrying the body of Claris Starling on his shoulder, still had a posture of the dancer, but already in “Silence of the lamb” (1991), Hopkins clearly had a clear one … It was the posture of the dancer, who will not confuse with anyone to confuse. Coincidence of views on the hero? God forbid.
Hopkins is magnificent in everything, starting from his voice (as he extends the words, how he stresses – all such a viscous, creaky, but extremely extremely alive) and ending with his eyes at Claris Staning in “silence” when he seemed to look at her, but his eyes seemed to be stitched by the poor Claris, and it seemed that the lecther was looking through her, as if he saw her all the way and as if he saw her all the way and as if he was seeing her all the way.Already twisting the whole essence of the heroine outside. If I saw this in real life, then, I am afraid, under such a look could not make any movement.
What unites all films about Hannibal is that they almost completely quote books. It is in the phrases. The order of scenes and their presence, of course,, due to the capabilities of the cinema to transfer books, still suffers (in the case, however, with a protracted-shifted book “Red Dragon”, on the contrary, but only an exception), but what kind of love and respect the films quote the original is great. And how the creators (and they were different, and therefore it is amazing for me that they are all so responsible) approach the images of the heroes – nothing superfluous, nothing far -fetched – everything is only according to the canon, according to the pages of books.
It is amazing that there was a small replacement in impressions.
The film "Red Dragon" seemed more interesting than the book (not surprisingly), and the film "Silence of the lambs" seemed worse than the book.
The film “Red Dragon” was clearly followed by the mood of the book: the NOLLEL GRAM (which was played by this Norton), weak Jack Crawford, insanely amazing Francis Dolarhaide, Slippery and Slippery Fradi Lunds and sweet blind Miss McClain, whose names there is no reason to remember.
The film "Silence of the lamb", in my opinion, fell victim to the genius of Hopkins, which sincused so that the eyes began to hurt. He was given a little more time than in the Red Dragon, but he used it, as many probably know, higher than ordinary human praise. Against his background, even decently played Jodie Foster in the role of Starling and Ted Livine in the role of James Gamba’s main reptile, not that they are lost – no, by no means secondary, but the rest are not visible, as well as the whole film, which is not visible from the acting, not that it was shot, but just like a detective, and with a hint of vengeance dueplot of timewater, somehow not perceived seriously. I want more Lecter, Foster and their conversations.
Or I didn’t understand something.
In any case, I do not share the delights about the film “Silence of the lamb”, I share enthusiasm for Hopkins, because it is calmly brilliant – and no less than.
And in this regard, the film "Hannibal" is fully consistent with the book – the same sensations. There are a lot of Hopkins, there are now a lot of Julianna Moore, there is even the immortal Gary Oldman, a very beautiful picture, a quote on a quote, style style.
The subsequent Hannibal: Climbing in this regard similarly carefully reacted to the original and quoted the most important moments of the history of the young not a doctor, but already lecturer. By the way, the young guy who plays Hannibal, or by chance, or specifically not only had some idea of the image (: 3), but also externally had an entertaining line with Anthony Hopkins: that Hopkins, what is the gaspar (I will not even try to write) asymmetry for the left half of his face, which makes the realization that the same character is in front of you.stronger.
Although I would remove a couple of unnecessary emotions and their manifestations that were not in the book, and I would get an exemplary early Lecter, but it would do so, especially since the film itself almost equally adopted the Japanese sophistication of the book, which in itself good.
Films almost perfectly moved the mood and images of books, and if you are too lazy to read books (or I am so intimidated by words about them), then as an alternative there is always a movie, and extremely high -quality from to.
And, what is there, the legendary already.
This is not taken away.
I’m not just the result of your influence. I’m not a product. I discarded good and evil for behaviorism. ©
Hunting and a bottle of deer, Brian you Fuller!
Comrade Fuller is a big lover of Hannibal. Amateur and, which is more important and already proved now, connoisseur. And moreover: Fuller is the Creator, who was able to skillfully show the unknown either from books, all the more by films from the history of Hannibal’s life, which preceded the events of the first book “Red Dragon”.
Yes, the series, all its two seasons are the background that takes place before the events of the Red Dragon.
Cast: Hannibal Lecter with his own person, Will Graham with his own person and … what the difference, who else, although the rest of the characters also deserve the lines with their own mention.
Will and Hannibal.
And you know about what the plot of the first season out of two?
About Mindfak.
You know what the plot of the second season?
About Mindfak.
You know what is happening over two seasons?
Bad detective action and chic miningfak.
Lecter is a psychiatrist, and Fuller, like none of his predecessors, decided to finally show this, because before we only knew that Hannibal practiced, knew a lot and generally had his own office.
The series shows a lot of Hannibal, which is digging in other people’s brains (Not Literally, if that), and digging is amazing.
Tons of philosophy and psychology are poured, tons of meanings, subtexts and semi -demonstrations are pouring from every second of the series.
Fuller, apparently, was also not particularly interesting to read about events in the book, and he devotes a lot of time to conversations, and very diverse and smart. Meaning-uisl, as we love. Or not. I love.
There are also events in the series, of course, there are also, and they are furnished (though not without the shortcomings of the essential ones), but the main thing that makes you watch is still conversations and their content, tied into the most elegant form inherent in Hannibal.
Here Hannibal decided to share the art of conducting conversations with some other characters, and in the end now in the series, almost all the heroes are beautiful and … melancholy?
The series is very dark.
There are few bright colors in it, fun and joy – too.
And at the same time, the series is insanely beautiful.
Fuller, by golly, some kind of fetishist by "see".
Each frame – and this is not an exaggeration – is simply licked to shine and is done as it should be in order to create the right impression, the necessary emotions and bring it to a state in which all these endless (there are really a lot of them) semi -subsidies and philosophical conversations were perceived adequately. This is also a great art-to bring the viewer to this state, because it is not too much to watch two seasons, we will be honest, not everyone will be a good detective, and especially considering how much you have to think on extensive abstract topics-all the more, it is not to everyone to like it.
And Fuller decided not to chase the viewer, but simply to do what he wants. Having wrapped it in a rampage, which we remember the book Hannibal.
The series is extremely cruel. Well, very much. No censorship, and if you are not sure about your nerves and stomach, it is better not to eat while watching it. If sure, good for you.
And this cruelty adds colors to the general background of the darkness that he said, and in the general background of psychological cruelty, because in this series the Cannibal father cuts the whole family with a knife, it is in this series that one person puts the most severe experiments on the other with the aim of … to make friends, in this series, the psyche of people is perverted so much that they are ready to realize their most secret desires ..
As a result, the general psychological background is categorically thick and sucks, without releasing. It’s like a visual drug during which you gain a voice in your head, which dictates you new meanings, new concepts, new words.
And this is great.
And this is no longer a series in the usual sense. As well as Hannibal, stuck between good and evil, as well as the Hopkins-lecter, we love, and we do not want to meet him in real life, as well as the series.
As a series, of course, it is weak. Intrigue is not a horse of this series, at least a detective intrigue of the first season. All the emphasis – on Hannibal and Will, their computers.
All the emphasis – on the picture.
All the emphasis – on actors.
It is worth telling about, in fact, Hannibale.
He is played by Danish actor Mads Mikkelsen, and he got … a very interesting Hannibal.
What is important: this is still Hannibal Lecter, whom we know. He still has the set of personal characteristics that the book version possessed and, accordingly, the Hopkins option.
But he, of course, is different.
Speaking of Hannibale-Mikkelsen, it is worth noting immediately that he demonstrates his intellect in an unobtrusive form. All the time he in general terms says something to the ordinary character’s replica, all the time he answers extensively and so that the person himself finds a response phrase in the abstraction of Hannibal. This is the taste of the new hero of Hannibal, this is his essence, this is his soul.
In addition, Mikkelsen perfectly played Hannibal and in the body, not forcing us to doubt that before us there is still an exquisite and refined representative of our own class of the elite to the last cage, to which we like Africa on foot.
During psychological sessions, he, again, never answers with a direct phrase to the question, but only pushes the client to solve the issue independently. During ordinary conversations – similarly.
This is another form of Hannibal’s game, and, coupled with his movements, it seems that it is extremely difficult to catch this person, if you want.
Among other things, Mads brought Hannibal to the image of Hannibal and his unique voice with these bending and as if sometimes mocking intonations. Danish (I believe that this Danish) the emphasis of the English language pleases the ear, and light burry only enhances the effect of the unusual image of the image (in the original, Hannibal is never an Englishman or an American, by the way).
Will Graham from actor Hugh Dansi (who, by the way, tried himself for the role of Hannibal in the film “Ascent”, but he was not taken – as it would be funny now), contrary to the book and film version, it turned out. Moreover: Reading during the viewing of the first season of the “Red Dragon”, I read only because the image of Dancei was sitting in my head, which replaced the book image of Wille.
In the series, Graham sparkles with all the colors of a quiet voice, a modest smile, the ability to super-emptia and an extremely subtle acting without replaying when, it would seem, Harris himself ordered. Moreover: outwardly Graham Dance is also extremely beautiful, and therefore to admire-coupled, as we recall, with an impeccable picture against the background-you can endlessly.
The series itself quoted in two seasons along and down There are already three books. Quoted through, in almost every series. There were so many intersections with these books that it is not clear what Fuller would do when it reaches the events of the Red Dragon – but he will cope.
And these quotes are simply excellent, for they are not just … quotes, they are woven, firstly, into new plots, secondly, into new meanings, and thirdly, they remain exactly what are quotes, and not by free expositions, and send readers and spectators of the original Harris stories and directors to be a lot of creativity, forcing them to recall, compare and smile from smileawareness of how carefully everything is done. How is it all out of the universe.
How good Mads Mikkelson is and how he harmonizes with Hopkins, despite the fact that as people they are even outwardly different and, of course, the vision of Hannibal is still slightly different.
But the work has done amazing.
The series is not for everyone, but if you find the strength and desire to penetrate deep into the personalities that are there, and drink the entire bowl of their fears, oddities and experiences to the bottom, then “Hannibal” is perfect your series.
An impeccably executed series about how one person controls everything, lives under classical music and … suffers from loneliness with all his external virtues.
Sad series.
And, again, not a villain Hannibal, although against the backdrop of honored audience sympathies to Will, he may seem like that.
He just does not know how otherwise.
You may not believe me now … but you.
© Will Graham
That’s something like that.
Hannibal Lecter and a little impressions about him.
If someone has not yet familiarized him with him, but wants to, then you can start with the series, simultaneously reading the books, and after books and the series-films as consolidating books.
I strongly recommend everyone – my journey gave me a bunch of pleasure (even if some parts had to make my way through weighty thorns of doubt about quality).
And Hannibal as a character has gained a cult status in my mind, not only because he is such in public, but also because he is really smart, interesting and beautiful, as befits not quite ordinary people.